Move limits from sticker numbers to actual length of printed stickers #3
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Since number of stickers are not an useful metric in knowing how much paper is actually used, i think we should move from rate limiting based on that to rate limiting based on mm of printed paper.
This way, users printing long stickers get penalized much more, while short occasional stickers will be pretty much ignored.
This also lets us manage remaining paper rolls by simply setting a global rate limit depending on the length of reels we use.